Skip to content

Make DPR.TECH and DPR.TYPE hierarchical

Hugo Buddelmeijer requested to merge hb/updatedprkws into develop

Make DPR.TECH and DPR.TYPE hierarchical as requested by AI https://jira.eso.org/browse/MIC-2142 and RIX https://jira.eso.org/browse/MIC-1639

Adam Dobrzycki: Please review the proposed values of DPR.TECH and DPR.TYPE, and
adopt a comma-separated approach going from generic first word to specific second word.
For example, DPR.TECH indeed should be:
   IMAGE[,STGH[,STHGELSE]] or
   SPECTRUM[,STHG[[,STGHELSE]
   etc.
e.g. IMAGE,DARK or IMAGE,FLAT
DPR.TYPE should be:
   OBJECT[,STGH[,STHGELSE]] or
   STD[,STGH[,STHGELSE]] or
   FLAT[,STGH[,STHGELSE]] or
   BIAS
   etc.
An example of generic-to-specific would be FLAT,SKY and FLAT,LAMP.
Then "like 'FLAT%'" will find both if you're after all flats.

Table 10 and 11 of ESO-044156_6DataInterfaceControlDocument.pdf give some example values for DPR.TECH and DPR.TYPE. I did not find those examples particularly useful or clear, so we decided to just not use any hierarchy for FDR.

@verdoes can you take a look whether these DPR.TECH and DPR.TYPE values make sense to you? The easiest way to review this is probably by looking at differences in the generated tex files.

Perhaps we should also tag these for discussion with Yves.

Merge request reports